Coleman v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court March 2, 1953

Coleman v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co., 218 Miss. 323 (Miss. 1953)

22 Adv. S. 37; 63 So. 2d 89; 1953 Miss. LEXIS 544

Arrington, Ethridge, Hall, Holmes, Kyle, Lee, Lotterhos, McGehee, Roberds

Dissenting Opinion

Ethridge, J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the views of the majority opinion in these cases. My views are expressed in the original opinions thereon, now withdrawn, and printed in 9 Adv. S. 1, 61 So. 2d, pages 291, 292, 294, 295, 296, and in the dissenting opinion on suggestion of error in the companion case of J. P. Coleman, Attorney General v. Trunk-line Gas Company, No. 38755.

Lee, Kyle and Arrington, JJ., concur in this dissent.

Opinion of the Court

*324ON SUGGESTION OF ERROR

Hall, J.

Except as to the length of lines and amount of tax involved, these cases are identical with and are controlled by the opinion this day delivered in the case of J. P. Coleman, Attorney General' v. Trunkline Gas Company, No. 38755, and for the reasons therein given the Suggestion of Error is sustained, the former opinions herein are withdrawn and the causes affirmed.

Suggestion of Error sustained, former opinions withdrawn and causes affirmed.

McGehee, C. J., and Roberds, Holmes and Lotterhos, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: J. P. Coleman, Attorney General v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. J. P. Coleman, Attorney General v. Texas Gas Transmission Co. J. P. Coleman, Attorney General v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. J. P. Coleman, Attorney General v. Interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. J. P. Coleman, Attorney General v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. J. P. Coleman, Attorney General v. Plantation Pipe Line Co. J. P. Coleman, Attorney General v. Midvalley Pipe Line Co.
Status: Published