Hart v. Heath

Mississippi Supreme Court
Hart v. Heath, 222 So. 2d 409 (Miss. 1969)
Rodgers, Gillespie, Jones, Brady, Inzer

Hart v. Heath

Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Justice.

The instruction complained of by the appellant in this case is clearly erroneous, and would ordinarily be considered a reversible error. However, under the facts shown in the record in this case the testimony is so overwhelmingly in favor of the defendant, and the verdict of the jury, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. See Miss.Sup.Ct. Rule 11 (1967).

Affirmed.

GILLESPIE, P. J., and JONES, BRADY and INZER, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Rebecca Hull Hart v. Charles R. Heath.
Status
Published