Hart v. Heath
Hart v. Heath
222 So. 2d 409
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hart v. Heath
Opinion of the Court
The instruction complained of by the appellant in this case is clearly erroneous, and would ordinarily be considered a reversible error. However, under the facts shown in the record in this case the testimony is so overwhelmingly in favor of the defendant, and the verdict of the jury, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. See Miss.Sup.Ct. Rule 11 (1967).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.