Barrett v. Astrue

District Court, D. Montana

Barrett v. Astrue

Trial Court Opinion

FILED JUN 1 2 2019 Cc S ste in IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT sha of oman Giana FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

MARK R. BARRETT, Plaintiff, No. CV 11-143-BLG-SEH

vs. ORDER NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

On May 28, 2019, Magistrate Judge Cavan issued his Findings and Recommendation! as to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees under

42 U.S.C. § 406

(b)(1).? No objection to the Findings and Recommendation were filed. No review is required of proposed findings and recommendations to which

no objection is made.’ The Court nevertheless will review Judge Cavan’s Findings

' Doc. 35. ? Doc. 29. 3 Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149-152

(1986). □□□

and Recommendation for clear error. Upon review, the Court finds no clear error, and accepts and confirms Judge Cavan’s Findings and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees under

42 U.S.C. § 406

(b)(1).! ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees under

42 U.S.C. § 406

(b)(1)” in the

amount of $46,000 is GRANTED. DATED this 1h say of June, 2019. gle US omy SAM E. HADDON x United States District Judge

4 Doc. 29. > Doc. 29. -2.

Reference

Status
Unknown