District Court, D. Montana, 2019

Smith v. Godfrey

Smith v. Godfrey
District Court, D. Montana · Decided July 23, 2019
Smith v. Godfrey

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION BENJAMIN KARL SMITH, CV 18–150–GF–BMM–JTJ Plaintiff, vs. ORDER D.J. GODFREY, WARDEN FLETCHER, ASST. WARDEN POWELL, MR. HENSON, CHAPLIN DE LELLA, and MR. MADRID, Defendants.

United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Findings and Recommendations in this case on April 24, 2019. (Doc. 25.) Judge Johnston recommended that Benjamin Karl Smith’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 4) and Motion to Grant Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21) be denied.

Neither party filed objections to Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations. The parties have waived the right to de novo review thereof. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Absent objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Reviewing for clear error and finding none, IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 25) are ADOPTED IN FULL. Smith’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 4) and Motion to Grant Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21) are DENIED.

DATED this 23rd day of July, 2019.

Fo ( k My.

4] } 7 = i Y/ f Brian Morris United States District Court Judge -2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.