Leyva v. Guyer
Leyva v. Guyer
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Be FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA AUG - § 2019 BILLINGS DIVISION Clerk, U S District Court District Of Montana Billings ANTHONY JOE LEYVA, CV 18-179-BLG-SPW-TJC Petitioner, Vs. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS LYNN GUYER; TIM FOX, AND RECOMMENDATIONS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondents.
The United States Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations on July 15,2019. (Doc. 9.) The Magistrate recommended the Court dismiss Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) for failure to prosecute under F. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax,
235 F.3d 422, 427(9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not find that the Magistrate committed clear error. IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendation entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 9) are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: 1. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED under F. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. 2. The Court shall not issue a certificate of appealability. 3. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner.
DATED this Lt vay of August, 2018.
SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown