Otto v. McTighe

District Court, D. Montana

Otto v. McTighe

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

ROBERT LEE OTTO, CV 19–05–GF–BMM–JTJ Petitioner, vs. ORDER LEROY KIRKEGARD, et al., Respondents. United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Findings and Recommendations in this case on July 15, 2019 (Doc. 13.) Judge Johnston

recommended that Petitioner Robert Lee Otto’s Petition (Doc. 1) should be dismissed with prejudice for lack of merit. Neither party filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The parties have waived the right to de novo review thereof.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C).

Absent objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149

(1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left

with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax,

235 F.3d 422, 427

(9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Reviewing for clear error and finding none, IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 13) are ADOPTED IN FULL. Otto’s Petition (Doc. 1) shall be dismissed with prejudice for lack of merit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk or Court is directed to enter, by separate document, a judgment in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. DATED this 12th day of August, 2019.

) I tu

United States District Court Judge

_2-

Reference

Status
Unknown