Chilinski v. State of Montana
Chilinski v. State of Montana
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
MIKE CHILINSKI,
Petitioner, CV 18-41-H-BMM-JTJ vs.
STATE OF MONTANA, TIM FOX, ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND STATE OF MONTANA, RECOMMENDATIONS
Respondents.
Pro se Petitioner Mike Chilinski applied for a writ of habeas corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1.) Chilinski requests that the Court dismiss his Montana state court convictions or, in the alternative, order a new trial in Montana State District Court omitting certain evidence. (Doc. 8 at 7.) Judge Johnston issued Findings and Recommendations on August 6, 2019. (Doc. 9.) Judge Johnston recommends that the Court deny Chilinski’s Amended Petition (Doc. 8). (Doc. 9 at 17.) Chilinski filed a 70-page objection to Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations on September 27, 2019. (Doc. 12.) 1 The Court reviews de novo those Findings and Recommendations to which a party timely objected.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court reviews for clear error the
portions of the Findings and Recommendations to which the party did not specifically object. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). Where a party’s objections constitute
perfunctory responses argued in an attempt to engage the district court in a reargument of the same arguments set forth in the original response, however, the Court will review the applicable portions of the findings and recommendations for clear error. Rosling v. Kirkegard,
2014 WL 693315*3 (D. Mont. Feb. 21, 2014)
(internal citations omitted). Chilinski’s objections advance the same arguments that he raised before. The Court will not engage in Chilinski’s attempt to reargue the same issues. The
Court reviewed Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations for clear error. The Court finds no error. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 9) are ADOPTED IN FULL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Chilinski’s Amended Petition (Doc. 8) is DENIED.
2 The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall immediately process the appeal if Chilinski files a Notice of Appeal. DATED this 8th day of November, 2019. C 1A
Brian Morris United States District Court Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown