IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION

NATALIE A. MATHER, CV 20–30–H–DLC–JTJ

Plaintiff,

vs. ORDER

SHELLY GLOEGE,

Defendant. On August 6, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered an Order and Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff Natalie A. Mather’s equal protection claim be dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 5.) Mather does not object. A party is only entitled to de novo review of those findings to which she specifically objects.

(b)(1)(C). This Court reviews for clear error those findings to which no party objects. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003); Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax,

(9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). There is no clear error in Judge Johnston’s determination that Mather’s Complaint fails to state an equal protection claim. Mather asserts her Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection was violated when the Montana Department of Labor and Industry provided a copy of her complaint against a licensed Montana real estate agent to the realtor but, per the department’s policy, did not provide her

with a copy with the realtor’s response. (Doc. 2 at 5–6.) Judge Johnston correctly determined that this claim does not allege a garden-variety equal protection challenge because Mather has not demonstrated her participation in a protected

class. See Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke,

, 290–91 (1978) (treating race as a suspect classification); Craig v. Boren,

(1976) (treating gender as a quasi-suspect classification). Nor does she adequately allege a class-of-one equal protection challenge as Mather does not allege that she and the

realtor are similarly situated, nor does she allege the Montana Department of Labor acted with discriminatory intent. See Village of Willowbrook v. Olech,

(2000); see also Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. Behrens,

(9th

Cir. 2008). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 5) is ADOPTED in full.

1. This matter is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter and enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to have the docket reflect that the Court certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. The record makes plain the instant Complaint is frivolous as it lacks arguable substance in law or fact. DATED this Ist day of September, 2020.

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge United States District Court