IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

SHAYNE BERTELSEN,

Petitioner, CV 20-39-GF-BMM-JTJ vs.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE STATE OF MONTANA, JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent.

Petitioner Shayne Bertelsen (“Bertelsen”) filed documents seeking a writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 1.) United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston issued Findings and Recommendations on June 17, 2020. (Doc. 5.) Judge Johnston recommends that the Court dismiss Bertelsen’s petition for having failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. (Doc. 5 at 6.) Bertelsen filed an objection to Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations on June 29, 2020. (Doc. 7.) The Court reviews de novo those Findings and Recommendations to which a party properly objected.

(b)(1). A proper objection requires more than a generalized objection to the magistrate judge’s Findings and 1 Recommendations. Alcantara v. McEwen,

, *1,

(S.D. Cal.). The Court reviews for clear error the portions of the

Findings and Recommendations to which the party did not specifically object. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,

(9th Cir. 1981). This standard applies even where the plaintiff proceeds pro se.

Alcantara,

at *3. Bertelsen objects to Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 7.) Bertelsen merely raises generalized objections. His objections do not identify with specificity any error the Magistrate Judge may have made. The Court

finds no specific objections and reviewed Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations for clear error. The Court finds no error. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 5) are ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. Petitioner’s Petition is DISMISSED (Doc. 1) as unexhausted. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter and enter judgment

pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to have the docket reflect that the Court certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 2 that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. No reasonable

person could suppose an appeal would have merit. The record makes plain the Complaint lacks arguable substance in law or fact. DATED this 29th day of June, 2020.

CK Hy A Nitin | “tu Brian Morris, Chief District Judge United States District Court