Kittrell v. Lt. Wilson
Kittrell v. Lt. Wilson
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
TOBY KITTRELL,
CV-19-89-GF-BMM-JTJ Plaintiff,
vs. ORDER
LT. WILSON, DHO LENAHAN, CASE MANAGER LIGGIT, and CO WARD,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Toby Kittrell (“Kittrell”), a prisoner proceeding without counsel, filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. 1) and a Complaint under
42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 2). United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston granted Kittrell’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Doc. 5). The Court then gave Kittrell the opportunity to amend his Complaint, so that he may pass the screening standard required in prisoner proceedings where the plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis. (Doc. 7); 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b), 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court informed Kittrell that the factual allegations in his original Complaint were insufficient to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). (Doc. 7); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal,
556 U.S. 662, 678(2009). Kittrell filed an Amended Complaint on June 10, 2020. (Doc. 8). The Amended Complaint reasserted the allegations set forth in the original Complaint
(Doc. 2), but provided even less factual information. (Doc. 8). United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston reviewed the Amended Complaint (Doc. 8) under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b), 1915(e)(2)(B). Judge Johnston
entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter on October 14, 2020. (Doc. 9). Judge Johnston recommended that this Court dismiss Kittrell’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 8), because it fails to state a federal claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 9).
No party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The Court has reviewed Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations and adopts them in full. ORDER Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
1. This matter is DISMISSED for failure to state a federal claim. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter and enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to have the docket reflect that the Court certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to have the docket reflect that this dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Kittrell failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dated this 2nd day of November, 2020.
) C A, ~ Ti ‘ Witin “tu Brian Morris, Chief District Judge United States District Court
Reference
- Status
- Unknown