District Court, D. Montana, 2021

Demarie v. Michael

Demarie v. Michael
District Court, D. Montana · Decided January 19, 2021
Demarie v. Michael

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA

HELENA DIVISION

DARREN C. DEMARIE,

CV 20-48-H-BMM-JTJ Petitioner, vs. ORDER

LYNN GUYER; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

MONTANA,

Respondents.

United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Findings and Recommendations in this case on December 17, 2020 (Doc. 13). Judge Johnston recommended that Defendants’ Amended Petition (Doc. 9) should be DISMISSED without prejudice as unexhausted, and that the Clerk of Court should be directed to enter by separate document a judgment of dismissal. Id. Neither party filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The parties have waived the right to de novo review thereof. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Absent objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Reviewing for clear error and finding none,

IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 13) are ADOPTED IN FULL. The Amended Petition (Doc. 9) is DISMISSED without prejudice as unexhausted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter by separate document a judgment of dismissal. A certificate of appealability will be DENIED.

DATED this 19th day of January, 2021.

~~ ' A 5 * 4 YA Nn Win | btu

Brian Morris, Chief District Judge United States District Court _2-

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.