Clary v. Salmonsen
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
CHARLES CLARY,
CV-21-52-H-BMM-JTJ Petitioner,
vs. ORDER JIM SALMONSEN; and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondents.
Petitioner Charles Clary (“Clary”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on July 21, 2021. (Doc. 1). United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston issued Findings and Recommendations in this matter on July 22, 2021. (Doc. 4).
Judge Johnston granted Clary’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, and recommended that this Court dismiss Clary’s petition for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc.
4 at 5). Judge Johnston also recommended that this Court deny issuance of a certificate of appealability, because this Court lacks jurisdiction and no other basis exists to encourage further proceedings at this time. Id. No party has filed an objection to the Findings and Recommendations. The Court has reviewed Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations and adopts them in full.
ORDER Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Clary’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a separate judgment of dismissal in favor of Respondents and against Clary.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Dated this 13th day of August, 2021.
□ V7) ‘ IN Gin 4 Pf Wht Mu United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.