Leider v. Schoppe
Leider v. Schoppe
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
CASEY WALLACE LEIDER, CV 21-22-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, VS. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS RANDEN SCHOPPE, and ERNIE AND RECOMMENDATIONS BEAR DON’T WALK, Defendants.
The United States Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations on October 14, 2021. (Doc. 9). The Magistrate recommended that the Court dismiss Leider’s Complaint for failure to prosecute. (Doc. 9 at 5). Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax,
235 F.3d 422, 427(9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not find that the Magistrate committed clear error. IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 9) are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Leider’s Complaint is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter and enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is further directed to have the docket reflect that the Court certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. The record makes plain that Leider has failed to prosecute this matter and/or comply with the Court’s orders.
DATED this ds of November, 2021.
slaale cgerrghe fetta United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown