IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION CV 21-06-GF-BMM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINDINGS OF FACT, Plaintiff, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, vs. JUDGMENT, AND ORDER OF FORFEITURE $5,098.00 in U.S. Currency, Defendant. This matter is brought before this Court by Plaintiff, United States, by and through its attorney, Victoria L. Francis, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Montana. The United States has filed a Motion for Entry of Judgment and Order of Forfeiture pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). Upon considering the pleadings filed herein, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On January 19, 2021, the United States instituted a judicial forfeiture action by filing in this cause a Verified Complaint in Rem against the defendant 1 currency in the amount of $5,098.00, to forfeit property under

(a)(6), asserting the defendant currency was furnished, or intended to be furnished,

in exchange for a controlled substance, and/or was used, or intended to be used, to facilitate one or more violations of

et seq. and 843(b). (Doc. 1). 2. On January 21, 2021, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and

Explosives executed the Warrant of Arrest in Rem (Doc. 3) that was issued by this Court on January 21, 2021, and arrested the defendant currency. (Doc. 5). 3. On July 29, 2020, the known potential claimant, Mitchell Wright, passed away while incarcerated at the Cascade County Detention Facility. AUSA Victoria

L. Francis located a telephone number for the parents of Mitchell Wright, Michael and Kathryn Wright, and confirmed that Michael and Kathryn Wright were the closest heirs to Mitchell Wight and there was no known open probate of his estate.

Michael Wright requested to see the Complaint. 4. On January 4, 2022, the United States provided “actual notice” of this civil asset forfeiture action, by mailing the Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture (Doc. 10), and Verified Complaint In Rem (Doc. 1), via first class U.S. mail and

first class U.S. Certified Mail, to Michael and Kathryn Wright, to the address provided (Doc. 12, ex.s 1-3). 5. Upon considering the United States’ Motion for Entry of Default of

Known Potential Claimants, Michael and Kathryn Wright, (Doc. 11) and 2 Declaration filed in support of the motion (Doc. 12), the Clerk of District Court entered the default of Michael and Kathryn Wright, on February 10, 2022, for

failure to timely file a verified claim and/or to answer or otherwise defend as required by the Supplemental Rules. (Doc. 13). 6. Notice of this forfeiture action was provided to any unknown potential

claimants by publishing on the government’s asset forfeiture website the Notice of Forfeiture Action for 30 consecutive days, beginning on September 15, 2021, and ending on October 14, 2021. The “Notice of Forfeiture Action” provides in pertinent part as follows:

Any person claiming a legal interest in the Defendant Property must file a verified Claim with the court within 60 days from the first day of publication (September 15, 2021) of this Notice on this official government internet web site and an Answer to the complaint or motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within 21 days thereafter. . . . (Dec. of Publication, Doc. 6, Att. 1). 7. Upon considering the United States’ Motion for Entry of Default of Unknown Potential Claimants, (Doc. 7) and Declaration filed in support of the motion (Doc. 8), the Clerk of District Court entered the default of unknown potential claimants on November 15, 2021, for failure to timely file a verified claim and/or to answer or otherwise defend as required by the Supplemental Rules. (Doc. 9). 3 8. The factual allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 35, of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem are verified by Mark Wozniak, Special

Agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (Doc. 1) Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Court makes the following conclusions of law.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 9. The Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to

and 1355. The United States has filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem to forfeit the defendant currency under

(a)(6), as currency

constituting monies or other things of value furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance, and/or were used or intended to be used to facilitate one or more violations of

, et seq.

10. Pursuant to

(b)(1)(A) and 1395(b) or (c), venue is proper in this district because this is a civil proceeding to forfeit United States currency found in this district, and the acts or omissions complained of occurred in this district.

11. Civil forfeitures are governed by the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. United States v. 2659 Roundhill Drive,

, 1149

n.2 (9th Cir. 2002). 4 12. The Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem sets forth detailed facts to support a reasonable belief that the United States will be able to meet its burden

of proof at trial as required by Supplemental Rule G(2)(f), to support probable cause, and to provide proof by a preponderance of the evidence to seize and arrest the defendant currency described in the verified complaint. The facts contained in

the verified complaint support the institution of these forfeiture proceedings for knowing and willful violations of

et seq. and subject to forfeiture under

(a)(6). 13. The totality of circumstances as set forth in the Verified Complaint in

Rem, demonstrates that there is a substantial connection that the defendant currency was furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance, and/or was used or intended to be used to facilitate one or more

violations of

, et seq. and 843(b). 14. Notice of this action was properly provided to known potential claimants, Michael and Kathryn Wright, by providing “actual notice” by mailing the Verified Complaint In Rem, in accordance with Supplemental Rule G(4)(b)(v).

15. Notice by publication was also provided to known and unknown potential claimants in accordance with Supplemental Rule (G)(4)(a)(iv)(C). 16. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) and Supplemental Rules A(2)

and G(5), the Clerk of District Court properly entered the default of any unknown 5 claimants (Doc. 9) and the known potential claimants (Doc. 13). 16. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) and 56(a) the United States is entitled to a judgment of default against the defendant currency in the amount of $5,098.00, as to any claims to the defendant currency. 17. The United States is further entitled to an order of forfeiture of the defendant currency in the amount of $5,098.00. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 1. The United States is granted judgment against the defendant currency in the amount of $5,098.00, and against any person asserting a claim to, or interest in, the defendant currency. 2. The defendant currency consisting of $5,098.00, is hereby forfeited to the United States and shall be disposed of in accordance with the law. DATED this 17th day of February, 2022. K 7 A Za . ine ML A

United States District Court