Reynolds v. Bludworth

District Court, D. Montana

Reynolds v. Bludworth

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION

RICHARD F. REYNOLDS, CV 22-22-H-BMM-JTJ PEITITIONER,

vs. ORDER

PETE BLUDWORTH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA,

Defendants.

United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Findings and Recommendations in this case on March 31, 2022 (Doc. 3). Judge Johnston recommended that Mr. Reynolds’s petition should be dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted; that the Clerk of Court should be directed to enter judgment of dismissal; and that a certificate of appealability should be denied. Neither party filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The parties have waived the right to de novo review thereof.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C). Absent objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149

(1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax,

235 F.3d 422, 427

(9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations and adopts them in full.

ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Mr. Reynolds’s petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice as unexhausted.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment of dismissal.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DATED this 7th day of June, 2022.

Kh vt 4, 7 Lae - “tu Brian Morris, Chief District Judge United States District Court

Reference

Status
Unknown