District Court, D. Montana, 2023

Lewis v. Anschutz

Lewis v. Anschutz
District Court, D. Montana · Decided March 2, 2023
Lewis v. Anschutz

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION MICHAEL T. LEWIS, CV 21-115-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS PHILIP ANSCHUTZ and AND RECOMMENDATIONS XANTERRA PARKS AND RESORTS, INC., Defendants.

The United States Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, pursuant to pro se IFP screening. (Doc. 6). The Magistrate recommended that Defendants Rodney Sisam, Mark Bogden, and “Bernard” be dismissed. (Doc. 6 at 3).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error.

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not find that the Magistrate committed clear error.

IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 6) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Rodney Sisam, Mark Bogden, and “Bernard” are DISMISSED.

ad DATED this day of March, 2023.

SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.