Iron Horse v. Whitehip
Iron Horse v. Whitehip
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
TIANA IRON HORSE, CV 22-122-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, VS. ORDER GAREY WHITEHIP, Defendant.
Before the Court is Defendant Garey Whitehip’s First Motion to Dismiss for
Lack of Jurisdiction. (Doc. 10). Defendant contends that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Morrison,
529 U.S. 598(2000) precludes jurisdiction in this case. (Doc. 11 at 3). Plaintiff concedes that the Court does not have
jurisdiction under Morrison and agrees to dismissal. (Doc. 12 at 1). Accordingly, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant’s First Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. 10) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to
enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close this matter.
□□ DATED this .@ day of March, 2023. A. Fs Mi Bien SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown