Hermann v. Commissioner of Social Security
Hermann v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
ANDREW JON HERMANN, CV 21-35-BLG-TJC
Plaintiff, ORDER vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
On September 28, 2022, the Court remanded this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 22.) That same day, the Clerk of Court entered a separate judgment. (Doc. 23.) Before the Court are two motions. First, Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees and indicated the motion was opposed. (See Docs. 24, 25-7.) Now, however, the parties have filed a stipulation for an award of attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (Doc. 26.) In the second motion, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of $7,152.92 in attorney’s fees. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the first motion (Doc. 24) is DENIED as moot. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (Doc. 26), IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $7,152.92 in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in this case, and will satisfy all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs and
expenses under
28 U.S.C. § 2412in this case. This award is subject to offset to satisfy any preexisting debt that Plaintiff owes the United States pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff,
560 U.S. 586(2010) and the Treasury Offset Program,
31 U.S.C. § 3716. Ifthe government determines Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of the award to be made directly to Plaintiffs counsel.
DATED this 6th day of January, 2023.
TIMOTHYIPCAVAN United States Magistrate Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown