Ashworth v. KB Orthopedics, Inc.

District Court, D. Montana

Ashworth v. KB Orthopedics, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

ROBERT ASHWORTH, CV 22–161–M–DLC

Plaintiff,

vs. ORDER

KB ORTHOPEDICS, INC., KARL BUHR, MEDICAL DEVICE BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and John Does 1–10,

Defendants.

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto’s Findings and Recommendations regarding Defendants’ removal from the Eleventh Judicial District Court of Flathead County, Montana, to the United States District Court for the District of Montana. (Doc. 20.) Judge DeSoto recommends: (1) because KB Orthopedics is not fraudulently joined and the parties are not completely diverse, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and should therefore remand this case to the Eleventh Judicial District Court of Montana, Flathead County; and (2) Plaintiff’s expedited unopposed motion for a status conference or stay of the scheduling order (Doc. 19) be denied as moot. (Doc. 20 at 13.) The Court agrees and will adopt Judge DeSoto’s Findings and Recommendations in full.

A party is only entitled to de novo review of those findings to which he or she specifically objects.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C). In the absence of an objection, this Court reviews findings for clear error. See Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149

(1985). Clear error review is “significantly deferential” and exists when the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax,

235 F.3d 422, 427

(9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Judge DeSoto’s Findings and Recommendation notified the parties of their right to

object (Doc. 20 at 14), but neither party objected. Reviewing Judge DeSoto’s opinion for clear error, the Court finds none. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Judge DeSoto’s Findings and

Recommendations (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Eleventh Judicial District Court of Montana, Flathead County. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s expedited unopposed motion

for a status conference or stay of the scheduling order (Doc. 19) is DENIED as moot. DATED this 13th day of October, 2023.

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge United States District Court

Reference

Status
Unknown