Hayashi v. Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America
Hayashi v. Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
MARK HAYASHI, CV 23-92-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, Vs. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS TRAVELERS PROPERTY AND AND RECOMMENDATIONS CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant.
The United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan filed Findings and Recommendations on November 3, 2023. (Doc. 45). The Magistrate recommended that Plaintiff Mark Hayashi’s Motion to Remand be denied on the grounds that the Court has diversity jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a) and 1441. (d.). Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm
conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax,
235 F.3d 422, 427(9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this
Court does not find that the Magistrate committed clear error.
IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered
by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 45) are ADOPTED IN FULL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Mark Hayashi’s Motion to
Remand (Doc. 9) is DENIED.
. « rR DATED this ./) day of November, 2023.
ZL C2 rt > /etatle ones “ SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown