Weinberg v. Navient Corporation
Weinberg v. Navient Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
LINDSAY E. WEINBERG, CV 23-123-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, Vs. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS NAVIENT CORPORATION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LCC, NAVIENT CREDIT FINANCE CORPORATION, and JOHN DOES, INC. 1-10, Defendants.
The United States Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations on
August 2, 2024. (Doc. 40). The Magistrate recommended that Plaintiff Lindsay E. Weinberg’s Motion for Remand be granted. (/d. at 1). Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax,
235 F.3d 422, 427(9th Cir.
2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not find
that the Magistrate committed clear error. IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered
by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 40) are ADOPTED IN FULL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Lindsay E. Weinberg’s Motion for
Remand (Doc. 37) be GRANTED. Since the case is being remanded to the state
court, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24) be
DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is ordered to close the case.
DATED this /? day of August, 2024. hue? dette SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown