Chesterman v. Salmonsen

District Court, D. Montana

Chesterman v. Salmonsen

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION TIMOTHY LLOYD CHESTERMAN, | Cause No. CV 23-117-BLG-SPW-TJC Petitioner, VS. ORDER WARDEN, CROSSROADS CORRECTIONAL!'; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondents.

On October 6, 2023, Petitioner Timothy Lloyd Chesterman filed a petition under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

. Chesterman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Chesterman’s petition will be dismissed without prejudice. Chesterman’s petition relates to his May 4, 2023, conviction in Yellowstone County Court. (Doc. 1 at 2.) His petition shows that he has not exhausted his state court proceedings, related to any petition for postconviction relief. (Doc. | ant 4 — 5.) Before he may proceed in this Court, Chesterman must exhaust his state judicial remedies with

respect to that claim by using the state’s normal channels for original and appellate review. See Rose v. Lundy,

455 U.S. 509, 520

(1981) (providing “a simple and

' The Court has amended the caption to show that, since the filing of his petition, Chesterman has moved from Montana State Prison to Crossroads Correctional Facility, Shelby, Montana. —

clear instruction to potential litigants: before you bring any claims to federal court, be sure that you first have taken each one to state court.”). Because Chesterman

may file in the Montana courts, he must. His federal petition will be dismissed without prejudice. He may file a federal habeas petition after he has properly exhausted his available state remedies. Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 485-86

(2000). A certificate of appealability,

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2), is not appropriate. Reasonable jurists would not find any exhausted claim. There is no reason to

encourage further proceedings in this Court at this time. Gonzalez v. Thaler,

565 U.S. 134, 150

(2012). Based on the foregoing, the Court enters the following: ORDER 1. Chesterman’s petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED as unexhausted. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter, by separate document, a judgment of dismissal. 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DATED this IPs of January, 2024. Lecce Ptehtten Susan P. Watters United States Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown