Riley v. Sims
Riley v. Sims
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
JAY SCOTT RILEY, CV 24-29-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, VS. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS DAVID P. SIMS, M.D., and ST. AND RECOMMENDATIONS VINCENT HOSPITAL INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH Defendants.
The United States Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations on April 2, 2025. (Doc. 18). The Magistrate recommended that Riley’s Amended Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. (ld. at 2). Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313(9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax,
235 F.3d 422, 427(9th Cir.
2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not find that the Magistrate committed clear error. IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 18) are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Riley’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 5) be DISMISSED without prejudice.
. 1), te . DATED this “day of April, 2025.
eplthesr ecsanade p □□□ Ct. SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown