District Court, D. Montana, 2026

Central Drilling, Inc. v. Hi Plains Building Division, LLC; NextEra Energy...

Central Drilling, Inc. v. Hi Plains Building Division, LLC; NextEra Energy...
District Court, D. Montana · Decided March 10, 2026
Central Drilling, Inc. v. Hi Plains Building Division, LLC; NextEra Energy...

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION CENTRAL DRILLING, INC., CV 25-101-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, VS. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND HI PLAINS BUILDING DIVISION, RECOMMENDATIONS OF LLC; NEXTERA ENERGY UNITED STATES OPERATING SERVICES, LLC; AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE CLEARWATER WIND LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendants.

Plaintiff Central Drilling, Inc. (‘Plaintiff’) brought this action against Defendants Hi Plains Building Division, LLC (“Hi Plains”), NextEra Energy Operating Services, LLC (“NextEra”), and Clearwater Wind Land Holdings, LLC (“Clearwater”), asserting claims for breach of contract and conversion. (Doc. 1-1 at 1-5). Before the Court is NextEra’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 2). United States Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan issued his Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 19) on February 23, 2026, recommending that the Motion be granted.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file any objections within 14 days of the filing of a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations.

Here, no objections were filed. When no party objects, the district court reviews the findings and recommendations for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if “the reviewing court... is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948). Having conducted this review, the Court finds no clear error and agrees with Judge Cavan’s analysis and conclusions.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Cavan’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 19) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: (1) Defendant NextEra’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 2) is GRANTED. (2) Count lis DISMISSED as to Defendant NextEra without prejudice and with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint on or before March 31, 2026. (3) Count II is DISMISSED as to Defendant NextEra with prejudice.

DATED this _/0“day of March, 2026. ) il |e □□□ SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.