State ex rel. McGEE v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial District
State ex rel. McGEE v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial District
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This is an original application for a writ of supervisory controL The application was made ex parte; the Court eon-
See C.J.S., Mandamus, § 210.
Northern, Inc. to appear so that the entire matter could be heard. We have had the benefit of oral arguments and briefs.
Relator McGee requests this Court to rule that the Burlington Northern’s affidavit of disqualification filed against the respondent district judge, the Honorable Paul G. Hatfield, in Cascade County, was not timely filed and was filed as an abuse of the disqualification statute, section 93-901, R.C.M. 1947.
We do not fully develop the background herein, but do observe that counsel for Burlington Northern who seeks a hearing from a judge who he, counsel, has already determined to disqualify, is not in good faith and would be estopped from thereafter disqualifying the judge under the statute.
However, in the instant case, Judge Hatfield has already arranged to call in another district judge and does not appear here to contest the matter. Accordingly, the matter is moot and we decline to accept jurisdiction.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE OF MONTANA ex rel. DONALD R. McGEE, Relator v. The DISTRICT COURT of the EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT of the STATE OF MONTANA, in and for the COUNTY OF CASCADE and the HONORABLE PAUL G. HATFIELD, Judge Presiding
- Status
- Published