State v. Raymond

Montana Supreme Court
State v. Raymond, 230 Mont. 12 (Mont. 1987)
Davis, Harkin, Honzel, Review

State v. Raymond

Opinion of the Court

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence for Count I, Burglary, 10 years; Count II, Theft, 10 years; These sentences are to run concurrently and three years of sentence has been suspended. DANGEROUS OFFENDER DESIGNATION, imposed on November 26, 1986, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

Dissenting Opinion

THE HONORABLE THOMAS HONZEL

DISSENTING: He would have granted the relief requested by counsel based on the age of the defendant, and the need for drug and alcohol treatment on an inpatient basis, which Judge Honzel would have *13made as a condition of the Defendant’s sentence before he would be eligible for parole.

DATED this 3rd day of April, 1987.

We wish to thank Terry Mailloux of the Montana Defender Project for assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE OF MONTANA v. CLIFFORD JAMES RAYMOND
Status
Published