State v. Leser
State v. Leser
Dissenting Opinion
DISSENTING: He would remove the Dangerous Designation on the basis of the age of defendant and his history of non-violence, otherwise he would leave the remainder of the sentence the same.
We wish to thank Patti Jensen of the Montana Defender Project for her assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.
Opinion of the Court
DECISION
The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence for Count I, Burglary, 10 years; Count II, Theft, 10 years; both to be served concurrently and concurrent to any other sentence presently being served; credit for 106 days served; plus conditions as stated in the May 7,1985 Decision rendered by Judge Martin; plus DANGEROUS DESIGNATION imposed on May 7, 1985, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE OF MONTANA v. JOSEPH JACOB LESER
- Status
- Published