State v. Sonnenberg
State v. Sonnenberg
Opinion of the Court
On August 25, 1993, the Defendant was sentenced to five (5) years for Felony Forgery with three (3) years suspended. Credit is given for time served plus conditions.
On November 19,1993, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and was represented by Tbrger Oaas, Attorney from Lewistown, Montana. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
The reason for the decision is' the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the
The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Tbrger Oaas, Attorney from Lewis-town, for his assistance to the defendant and to this Court.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE OF MONTANA v. CONNIE SONNENBERG
- Status
- Published