State v. Gilbert
State v. Gilbert
Opinion of the Court
On June 8, 1994, the said Brant Gilbert had been duly convicted in this Court of the crime of Attempt (Deliberate Homicide) Felony; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said Brant Gilbert be punished by imprisonment in the Montana
On May 23,1996, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and was represented by Lucas Foust, legal intern of the Montana Defender Project. The state was represented by Dennis Paxinos, County Attorney from Billings.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division provides: "The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (Section 45-18-904(3), MCA.) The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 23rd day of May, 1996.
The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Lucas Foust, legal intern of the Montana Defender Project for representing Brant Gilbert in this matter and also Dennis Paxinos, County Attorney from Billings, for representing the State.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE OF MONTANA v. Brant Gilbert
- Status
- Published