On March 26,1999, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: sixty (60) years in the Montana State Prison - the defendant *46shall be ineligible for parole or participation in the supervised release program for twenty-five (25) years. Count III: twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with all of that time suspended, to run consecutively to the sentence imposed in Count I. Counts II and IV were dismissed and Count III was amended from Aggravated Burglary to Burglary.

On June 17, 1999, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and represented by Randi Hood. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division provides: “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (Section 45-18-904(3), MCA.) The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 17th day of June, 1999.

DATED this 15th day of July, 1999.