Timis v. Young
Timis v. Young
Opinion
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. 00-232
2001 MT 63A ______________
JIM TIMIS and CONNIE TIMIS, both individually and on behalf of their minor daughter, CHARDEE TIMIS, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MARK YOUNG, JOHN YOUNG and ROSE YOUNG, d/b/a ROSE'S DAY CARE, Defendants and Respondents.
ORDER ______________
On April 27, 2001, appellants filed herein a petition for rehearing, and on May 4, 2001, respondents filed their objection thereto. The Court having considered the same, IT IS ORDERED that the first sentence of Paragraph 3 of this Court's opinion dated April 18, 2001, is hereby amended to read: "Later, the Timises repudiated the agreement and refused to sign the settlement documents." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied. file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (1 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm
DATED this 15th day of May, 2001.
/S/ KARLA M. GRAY /S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART /S/ TERRY N. TRIEWEILER /S/ JAMES C. NELSON /S/ JIM REGNIER
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (2 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.