On June 22, 2005, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Fifteen (15) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for the offense of Burglary, a felony; and Count IV: A commitment to the Lewis and Clark County Jail for a term of sixty-six (66) days, to run concurrent to Count I, for the offense of Theft, a misdemeanor.

On November 15, 2005, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Martin Eveland. The ■ state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Ride 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is *120presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 15th day of November, 2005.

DATED this 22nd day of November, 2005.