On January 5, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Burglary, a felony; and Count II: Ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, with all time suspended, to run consecutively to Count I, for the offense of Theft, a felony.

On May 4, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Martin Eveland. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are sufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly excessive in light of sentences given toward similar crimes around the state.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be amended as follows: Count I: Twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended; and Count II: Ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, with all time suspended, to run consecutively to Count I. The terms and conditions shall remain as imposed in the Judgment of January 5, 2006.

Done in open Court this 4th day of May, 2006.