On August 10,2006, the defendant was sentenced as follows: Count L Ten (10) years in the Montana Women’s Prison, with two (2) years suspended, for the offense of Deceptive Practices (Common Scheme), a felony; Count III: Fifteen (15) years in the Montana Women’s Prison, with seven (7) years suspended, for the offense of Forgery (Common Scheme), a felony; and Count VII: Five (5) years in the Montana Women’s Prison, for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a felony. Said sentences shall run concurrent with each other and any other sentence the Defendant is serving.

On April 6, 2007, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Kris Copenhaver-Landon. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or *38increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.