Montana Supreme Court, 2016

State v. Richardson

State v. Richardson
Montana Supreme Court · Decided November 18, 2016 · Chairperson, Gilbert, Hon, Newman, Seeley
386 Mont. 112

State v. Richardson

Opinion of the Court

DECISION

On June 30, 2016, the Court sentenced the Defendant to the Department of Corrections for a period of thirteen (13) months, with recommendations for the WATCh Program, followed by a five (5) year suspended period of commitment to the Department of Corrections, for the offense of Driving Under the Influence of Drugs or Alcohol, a Felony, in violation of §61-8-401(1), *113MCA. Upon successful completion of appropriate treatment, the balance of the 13-month DOC commitment shall be suspended. The Court granted the Defendant credit in the amount of seven (7) days for time served in custody pending final disposition in this matter.

Done in open Court this 18th day of November, 2016. DATED this 8th day of December, 2016.

On November 18, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.