Cooley v. Cooley
Cooley v. Cooley
Opinion
09/17/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0427
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0427
RISE MAY COOLEY, Co-Petitioner AND Appellee, vs. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT HARVEY LYNN COOLEY Co-Petitioner and Appellant.
This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT Anita Roessmann, whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.
A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.
DATED this September 17, 2020.
Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court c: Rise May Cooley, Brad Lee Belke, Anita Roessmann
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.