Zito v. Geehan
Zito v. Geehan
Opinion
ORIGINAL 06/28/2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 22-0201
DA 22-0201 _ STEPHANIE ZITO, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF CHARLES EUGENE FISCH, JUN 2 8 2022 Bovvu I E.: nwo od Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana Appellant, ORDER v. EILEEN GEEHAN, Appellee.
On June 9, 2022, Appellee Eileen Geehan moved to dismiss this appeal on various grounds. On June 22, 2022, Appellant Stephanie Zito, Personal Representative of the State of Charles Eugene Fisch, responded that she did not object to dismissal. Both parties further request their attorney fees.
The parties agree this appeal should be dismissed. The Court has determined that no attorney fees are warranted in this instance.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to dismiss this appeal is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties' requests for attorney fees are DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDRED that this appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice.
The Clerk is directe to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record.
DATED this Z.( day of June, 2022.
4! Al .''1*IL
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.