State v. T. Munyan
State v. T. Munyan
Opinion
ORIGINAL 06/28/2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 21-0200
DA 21-0200 JUN 2 8 2022 STATE OF MONTANA, ivVOUCI BUNN,: Clerk ot Court State of Montana Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ORDER TIMOTHY GALE MUNYAN, Defendant and Appellant.
Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 16(5), the parties in this matter have stipulated and move for an order remanding this proceeding to the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, and dismissing the remainder of this appeal with prejudice.
The parties agree that at sentencing, the District Court struck paragraph 13(b) of the presentence investigation report, which recommended a $500 surcharge under § 46-18- 236(1)(b), MCA. However, the written judgment includes a $20 surcharge under § 46-18- 236(1)(b), MCA. The parties agree that it is in the best interests of justice and efficiency for this Court to remand this matter to the District Court to strike this surcharge from the written judgment. Appellant Timothy Gale Munyan has agreed to dismiss the remainder of this appeal with prejudice.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for entry of an amended judgment and sentence. The court is directed to STRIKE the $20 surcharge under § 46-18-236(1)(b), MCA, from the written judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the rernainder of this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record, to the Clerk of Court for Lincoln County, and to the Honorable Matthew Cuffe, presiding District Judge.
Dated thisZ day of June, 2022.
Chief Justice
s.jr:/% 44
( 2"4 1a) stices
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.