State v. C. Querfurth
Opinion
ORIGINAL
09/26/2023 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Case Number: DA 22-0148
DA 22-0148
FILED STATE OF MONTANA, SEP 2 6 2023
Bowen G!•-:enwood Clerk of Supreme Court
State of Montana Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. ORDER CHRISTOPHER M. QUERFURTH,
Defendant and Appellant.
Counsel for Appellant Christopher M. Querfurth filed a motion and brief asking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Querfurth responded to counsel's brief and objected to counsel's motion.
The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders. We have considered the arguments raised by counsel and by Querfurth. We conclude no arguments with potential legal merit can be raised on direct appeal.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED.
The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to Querfurth personally.
DATED this day of September, 2023.
Chief Justice 4? /Q/C ".
Justices
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.