Montana Supreme Court, 2024

House v. Salmonsen

House v. Salmonsen
Montana Supreme Court · Decided December 31, 2024

House v. Salmonsen

Opinion

12/31/2024

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: OP 24-0723

OP 24-0723 FILED TIMOTHY HOUSE DEC 31 2024 Petitioner, Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana v. ORDER JAMES SALMONSEN, WARDEN, Montana State Prison, Respondent.

Timothy House has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to which he has attached a pleading alleging structural error with the charging document in his criminal case. House contends that this "structural error" requires reversal because such use would dictate a civil proceeding, not criminal, "as defined by Congress and by Constitutional Law out of the Supreme Court of the United States[.]" House cites to several cases, dating back to the 1700s. House contends that he is illegally incarcerated.

In September 2012, House entered a plea of nolo contender to sexual intercourse without consent in the Eleventh Judiciat District Court, Flathead County. He later moved to withdraw the plea and to enter a plea of guilty by way of an Alford plea.' In February 2013, the District Court sentenced House to twenty years at the Montana State Prison with thirteen years suspended. This Court denied his Petition for an Out-of-Time Appeal. State v, House, No. DA 13-0553, Order (Mont. Sept. 11, 2013).

House is precluded from challenging the commencement of a prosecution or raising any issue of structural error as a remedy of habeas corpus relief. See §§ 46-22-101(1), and -101(2), MCA. A Petitioner, such as House, cannot challenge his conviction through this remedy. Lawrence v. Guyer, 2019 MT 74, 11, 395 Mont. 222, 440 P.3d 1 (We stated

N.C. v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S. Ct. 160 (1970). that Petitioner "Lawrence's challenges to the court's authority needed to be raised prior to the plea agreement."). House's constitutional challenges also are not appropriately raised in this habeas corpus proceeding. Gates v. Missoula Cnty. Comm'rs, 235 Mont. 261, 262, 766 P.2d 884, 884-85 (1988). His remedy would have been a direct appeal of his conviction to address any structural defect or error, which did not occur.2 Lawrence, ¶ 12.

House is not entitled to habeas corpus relief. He has not demonstrated illegal incarceration with his instant Petition. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that House's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is CLOSED as of this Order's date.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to Timothy House personali4 DATED this 31 day of December, 2024.

Chief Justice

2 House appealed the denial of his petition for postconviction relief, which this Court affirmed.

House v. State, No. DA 14-0446, 2015 MT 304N, 2015 Mont. LEXIS 499 (Oct. 20, 2015).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.