Morris v. Lapene
Morris v. Lapene
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The Act of 1827, which is in effect the same as that of 1791 as to this particular, allows to the plaintiff’s attorney five dollars for “ every motion for a new trial, in arrest of judgment, or special matter and argument on trial in Circuit, or in the Court of Appeals.”
The universal practice has been' and still is, to allow this charge in all cases where a trial has been had upon an issue joined between the parties ; but no instance now occurs to me in which it has been claimed on the execution of a writ of inquiry: and generally speaking, it clearly could not,-for there are but few instances in which an argument would be useful or necessary. But to this there are some exceptions.
In actions on penal bonds conditioned for the performance of covenants, the defendant, although he may have made default and judgment may be entered against him, may nevertheless'compel the plaintiff by rule to submit the condition to a jury, to ascertain the damages. So in actions sounding altogether in damages, the defendant, although he may have made default and not pleaded, may, according to the practice, come in and contest the amount of damages; and it is not unusual, that these cases call forth a great deal of discussion, on matters of law as well as of fact. Now in these cases, and others of a similar nature, I can see no reason why it should not be allowed. The question quart-
Motion granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.