Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1830

Guphill v. Isbell

Guphill v. Isbell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Decided January 15, 1830 · Colcock, Johnson, Nott
17 S.C.L. 369

Guphill v. Isbell

Opinion of the Court

Johnson, J.

The authorities all agree, that the marriage of a feme sole plaintiff, pendente lite, may be pleaded in abatement, provided it be pleaded puis darrein continuance. Bae. Abr. Abatement. G. This is a matter of substance, and not of form merely ; and the defendant having brought himself within the rule, it was a right, the exercise of which the Circuit Court bad *370no discretion to withhold from him. The Court erred, there- , , , ... fore, m rejecting the plea, and on that ground a new trial is granted to the defendant, with leave to file the plea mine pro tunc.

Nott, J. and Colcock, J. concurred.

Motion granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.