Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971

Slocumb v. Metts

Slocumb v. Metts
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Decided July 14, 1971 · Campbell, Hedrick, Mallard
12 N.C. App. 43; 182 S.E.2d 12; 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1279

Slocumb v. Metts

Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

By his one assignment of error, the plaintiff contends that the court failed to declare and explain the law arising on the evidence as required by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 51 (a). We have carefully examined the court’s instructions to the jury, and find that the court fully, fairly, and adequately declared and explained the law arising on the evidence as presented at the trial. The assignment of error is without merit.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Campbell concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.