Roth v. Parsons
Roth v. Parsons
192 S.E.2d 659; 16 N.C. App. 646; 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1793
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Roth v. Parsons
Opinion
We hold that the court properly dismissed the third cause of action. Although appellants attempt to distinguish their case from Henson v. Thomas, 231 N.C. 173, 56 S.E. 2d 432 (1949), we think the legal principles1 in the cases are the same and that the majority opinion in Henson is controlling here. For that reason, the judgment appealed from is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.