Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972

Reno v. Rogers

Reno v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Decided April 26, 1972 · Brock, Hedrick, Vaughn
14 N.C. App. 286; 187 S.E.2d 881; 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2113

Reno v. Rogers

Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

A recital of the evidence presented in this case could serve no useful purpose. There was evidence which would have permitted but not required a finding of negligence on the part of the plaintiff. There was evidence which would have permitted but not required a finding of negligence on the part of the defendant. The case was one for the jury.

On Plaintiff’s appeal the judgment is reversed.

On Defendant’s appeal the judgment is reversed.

Judges Brock and Hedrick concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.