State v. Bunn
State v. Bunn
19 N.C. App. 582; 199 S.E.2d 487; 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1712
State v. Bunn
Opinion of the Court
We have carefully considered each of defendant’s assignments of error and conclude that they present no prejudicial error. It seems clear to us from a reading of the evidence and the charge of the trial judge that defendant was granted a full and fair trial. In our opinion the errors complained of by-defendant were not prejudicial and did not affect the results of the trial. A new trial will not be ordered for nonprejudicial error.
No error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.