Defendant contends that the evidence presented, and the findings made by the trial judge, were not sufficient to support the order appealed from. We agree with the contention in one particular.

*69To qualify for alimony pendente lite, a dependent spouse must show, among other things, that said spouse does not have sufficient means whereon to subsist during the prosecution or defense of his or her action and to defray the necessary expenses thereof. G.S. 50-16.3 (a) (2). When an application is made for alimony pendente lite, and a hearing is held pursuant to the application, the judge must find the facts from the evidence presented. G.S. 50-16.8 (f). “At any time that a dependent spouse would be entitled to alimony pendente lite pursuant to G.S. 50-16.3, the court may, upon application of such spouse, enter an order for reasonable counsel fees for the benefit of such spouse, to be paid and secured by the supporting spouse as in the same manner as alimony.” G.S. 50-16.4.

In the case at hand, while the court made findings with respect to plaintiff’s poor physical condition and her need for additional monthly income, the court made no finding as to whether plaintiff had any separate estate or financial resources whereon to subsist during the prosecution of her action and to defray the necessary expenses thereof. For that reason, the order appealed from is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Error and remanded.