State v. Quick
State v. Quick
23 N.C. App. 119; 208 S.E.2d 242; 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2031
State v. Quick
Opinion of the Court
The evidence on behalf of the State was sufficient to require submission of the case to the jury. Counsel for defendant frankly admits that no prejudical error was committed at trial. The State in its brief agrees. We have examined the various assignments of error and the record proper and find no prejudicial error.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.