McRae v. Moore
McRae v. Moore
Opinion of the Court
The court made no adjudication of defendants’ counterclaim for damages allegedly resulting because plaintiffs filed a lis pendens on the property after the expiration of the option, which prevented defendants “from selling their property or from using it as collateral to obtain money badly needed in their business affairs.” Thus, the judgment from which plaintiffs appeal adjudicates fewer than all the claims of the parties.
Since the trial court made no determination that “there is no just reason for delay,” the judgment “does not terminate the
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.