Wright v. Asheville Pool & Gunite Co.
Wright v. Asheville Pool & Gunite Co.
Opinion of the Court
The appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Appellants failed to comply with Rule 9(b)(l)(ix) which requires that the record on appeal shall contain “a copy of the notice of appeal, or of the appeal entry showing appeal taken orally, and of all other appeal entries relative to the perfecting of appeal.” We have, nevertheless, elected to consider the case on its merits.
On 25 July 1978, the trial judge granted defendant’s motion for directed verdict made at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence.
There are no assignments of error directed to any part of the trial which resulted in judgment against the appellants. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.